I recently told a friend that I was planning on reviewing Rio 2, to which she responded “Why do
you do this to yourself?” I told her
that I feel like I should give all movies a fair chance, despite how they may
seem. After all, I have been surprised
before, liking films that have received horrible reviews and hating films that
are universally acclaimed. I may not
have liked the first Rio all that
much, but that doesn’t mean that the sequel has to follow in its
footsteps. Unfortunately, though, it
does, and it starts a downward trajectory in quality for this already middling
franchise.
The plot of Rio 2
is a bit of a mess, combining elements of Ferngully,
Meet the Parents, and any family
vacation film ever made. Blue and Jewel
have three children now, all shallow archetypes of the nuclear American family: the
surly teenager, the brainy girl, and the rambunctious youngest brother. They all discover that there may be some more
blue macaws living in the Amazon, so they decide to fly down to
investigate. (The supporting cast of the
first film tags along as well for no discernable reason other than to provide
an excuse for a filler subplot about finding performers among the Amazon’s
residents. That particular thread goes
nowhere.) They find the macaws fairly
quickly, and they turn out to be Jewel’s long lost tribe, and Blue must try to
prove himself to be just as wild as they are in order to fit in.
There’s also a threat from a logging company, and this is
where I think the film breaks down.
Instead of resolving the conflict between Blue’s urban nature and the
tribe’s naturalism, Blue simply becomes the leader in a climax against the
loggers, and all previous conflict between Blue, Jewel, and Jewel’s tribe
leader father gets swept aside in favor of happy endings. The loggers are as boring and generic as they
come, without so much as a name to anyone’s credit, so there isn’t even any
enjoyment to be had from villainous antics.
The closest we get to that is the return of Nigel, the
film’s first villain, played once again by Jemaine Clement. While you can see that Clement is trying to
make the performance entertaining, the script doesn’t give Nigel much to do
outside of making continuous foiled attempts to kill Blue. Even when the final confrontation between the
two does finally happen, it has zero impact on the story as a whole, and
Nigel’s entire storyline could easily have been cut in favor of expediting this
tortured experience. The only reason I
can think to bring the character back is that Clement’s performance in the
first film was about the only thing that made the film bearable, and realizing
the same deficiency in this film, the writers attempted to replicate that same
magic. However, it doesn’t work, and
feels forced and unnecessary.
Ultimately, this film is exactly what it appears to be: a
low-effort cash-in sequel. The first Rio was the type of film that would only
appeal to the youngest of audiences, and this installment isn’t any different,
descending even further into inanity and banality. Your kids may like it, but it’s even less
worth your time than the first one.
Why do I do this
to myself? Leave your thoughts in the
comments below!
No comments:
Post a Comment