Oscar Nominations
Best Adapted Screenplay - Paul Thomas Anderson
Costume Design
It’s very tempting to compare Inherent Vice to one of my all-time favorite films, The Big Lebowski. Both are comedic films with noir
sensibilities about stoner detectives attempting to unravel a plot much bigger
than themselves. However, to judge
either film through reference to the other would be an injustice to both films,
as Inherent Vice is an entirely
different animal than The Dude’s screwball antics. Inherent
Vice may be a comedy, but more than that it is a subtly crafted labyrinth
of interconnected plot threads that ultimately add up to an immense
conspiracy. To claim that this is a new Lebowski would be to assume a nihilism
in the film that simply isn’t there, and while I don’t necessarily think Inherent Vice is one of the best films
you’ll see this year, I do think it is definitely worth seeing at a time when
most other Oscar bait is so unappetizing.
Our protagonist is Doc (Joaquin Phoenix), a private
detective constantly berated by law-enforcement for being a dirty hippie, which
he most unabashedly and assuredly is, a joint never far from his lips. The time is 1970, just as the counter-cultural
revolution of the 60’s is coming to a close and the corporate world is making
its move to capitalize on said revolution’s cultural pastiches. The story… Well, I think the trailer for the
film does a better job of describing what’s going on than I ever could, and
even that is dense and confusing. I feel
the need to disclaim that there may be entire scenes where you will sit in
confusion, as the plot is purposely littered with branching and reconnecting
threads, forcing you to keep track of a whole slew of emerging conspiracies
that only begin to reconcile toward the film’s conclusion.
Luckily, snappy dialogue and ludicrous delivery give this
film the necessary momentum that not every moment need clarity. In fact, the primary purpose of the film seems
to be its audience’s bewilderment, providing a dialogue-induced haze
reminiscent of the onslaught of drugs the entire cast is constantly
imbibing. The film even sneaks in some
tragic moments, the shining example coming in the form of an extended, one-take
monologue from Katherine Waterston as Doc’s ex-girlfriend/employer. But this is offset by the comedy, which often
comes in the form of bizarre phallic imagery, absurdist situations, and wit so
sharp that it may not realize it has cut you until three lines later.
However, I do think this film has its faults, notably in
that it is overlong in its resolution.
My understanding is that the film’s script adheres quite faithfully to
the novel it is based on, and while that may be appreciated by fans of the
book, it does not make for an entirely engaging three-act structure. The film’s primary conflict is resolved
approximately 105 minutes in, leaving an additional 45 minutes to wrap up loose
ends. That isn’t to say that interesting
events don’t happen during that remainder, but it does make one want to check
their watch a bit more often than a film should. Some reworking of events would have provided
a plot resolution in closer chronological proximity to the conclusion of some
key character arcs; but as it is, the film isn’t broken, simply slow.
Inherent Vice is a
great alternative to all the lackluster films battling it out for Best Picture
this year. It’s smart, funny, and
wickedly clever in its commentary on America, capitalism, and drug culture. And I may just have to see it again to track
all the details that I probably missed on my first viewing. But as of this first viewing, I can
definitely say this one is worth the price of admission.
What absurdist stoner comedies to you appreciate? Share your favorites in the comments below.
No comments:
Post a Comment