I feel a bit cheated by the marketing for Rams.
Billed as a comedy, I didn’t find myself laughing a whole lot at this
tale of two feuding brothers. I’ve noted
before that comedy can be quite difficult to translate across language and
culture, so perhaps I just don’t have a firm grasp on Icelandic comedy or
didn’t find the subtitled delivery as nuanced as I should have, but this was
never a film that made me laugh.
However, as a drama, Rams
works quite well and serves as a reminder that Iceland can produce some
touching cinema.
The two aforementioned brothers are Gummi and Kiddi,
sheepherders who haven’t spoken to one another in forty years, yet live on
adjacent properties and deign to only ever communicate via written messages
carried between them in the mouth of a dog.
An outbreak of scrapie is discovered in Kiddi’s herd, so by government
edict all the sheep in the area much be exterminated to prevent infection from
spreading, leaving the farmers without a means of production or income. Gummi keeps some of his sheep and a single
ram hidden in his basement, yet things get complicated when a drunken Kiddi
stumbles across them one evening.
The double entendre of the title is where most of the
dramatic tension comes from, and as a character piece there’s quite a bit of
meat to this film. Gummi and Kiddi are
characters defined by an ill-defined feud, the origin of which doesn’t matter
nearly as much as the fact that their lives have evolved based on a resistance
toward reacquainting. Circumstance
ultimately forces them to communicate once more, and the result is trying as it
is touching, a poignant reflection on the bonds of family and the pettiness of
old grievances. The final shot alone is
enough to make the preceding ninety minutes worth it, even if the pacing of
those minutes can be slow at times.
But I once again have to come back to the fact that I can’t
wrap my head around how this is supposed to be a comedy. There are a few physical gags that I suppose
would be funny in theory, yet I didn’t think the timing worked to encourage
laughter. There are moments of supposed
shock comedy where we see our aged leads in the nude, but again, I don’t see
why that on its own is apparently funny.
I have read other reviews that call this film riotous, yet the human
drama at play is much more engaging and much more consistently on point that
any attempts at slapstick. In fact, if
any of the comedy actually registered as such, I’d be tempted to call it
inappropriate, given the gravity of the situation to the characters and the
somber tone inherent in a premise where livelihoods are on the line.
So yeah, maybe I’m not tuned to this film’s comedic
wavelength, but that doesn’t mean I think it doesn’t work as a good film. It’s a touching piece of relationship drama
that revolves around a couple of humanly flawed characters. I just wish I were in on the joke.
No comments:
Post a Comment