If you’ve ever read my reviews of documentaries, it’s likely
apparent that I have a difficult time measuring the worth of a documentary, as
I think the value that anyone is going to get from watching one is largely
dependent on the subject matter. So, on the
off chances when I do watch a documentary, the question I find myself asking is
“what about this film makes it good or bad as compared to any other
documentary?” And now, for the first
time since starting my film critiques, I may have an answer in Lambert and Stamp. This is a film that could have been much
better, if only it had picked a thematic throughline and run with it.
Ostensibly this film is about the eponymous Kit Lambert and
Christopher Stamp, aspiring filmmakers in the 1960s who struggled through
obscurity in the film business. They
collaborated on an idea to get their careers off the ground: they would find a
rock band and, through managing the band, would make a film about that band’s
rise to fame. This is how the duo became
the managers of one of the most successful rock bands of all time, The Who.
Now, there’s a lot of material to work with in a premise
like this. There’s the relationship
between Lambert and Stamp themselves, their relationship with the band, their
personal lives, pretty much anything that any other biographical arc in a
documentary would cover. However, the
star power of The Who pulls focus away from our supposed protagonists, making
the most interesting parts of the film those that have to do with the band’s
rise to fame, and not about the people who were responsible for it.
This is largely due to how the filmmakers decided to present
the information they had archived, directly presenting rambling interviews with the
surviving members of the band and Stamp himself (Lambert had passed away years
ago) over archival footage of the band and, to a lesser extent, the managing
duo. This is all quite interesting as a
historical glimpse at rare footage of The Who and understanding some of the
backstage drama that went into the creation of such albums as Tommy and Who’s Next, but it splits the film’s focus between being a Who fan
film and a character study of Lambert and Stamp, causing it to fail at being
either very effectively.
This is a film that will work for you only if you are a
diehard fan of The Who and are interested in seeing the rare footage this film
has to offer. In a sense, this also
works as the film that Lambert and Stamp never got to make in their years
managing the band, their whole purpose in pursuing management in the first
place. But for a film called Lambert and Stamp, it can’t seem to
entirely commit to either a representation of the duo or a representation of
the greatness they enabled. As a result,
it comes off as a bit of a directionless mess that most people shouldn't bother with.
No comments:
Post a Comment