Oscar Nominations:
Best Picture
Mark Rylance - Best Supporting Actor
Matt Charman, Ethan Coen, & Joel Coen - Best Original Screenplay
Best Production Design
Best Sound Mixing
I did not see Bridge of Spies in theaters, and judging by the box office returns, chances are neither did you. And that’s a damn shame considering that this is Steven Spielberg’s best film as director since Saving Private Ryan. Late career Spielberg is often criticized for being overly sentimental and placing emphasis on cheesy moments of catharsis, but Bridge of Spies is an incredible exercise in restraint that proves that Spielberg is still one of the best directors of American history, even if he hasn’t quite reached the heights of his early career that made him so beloved.
Set during the Cold War, our story follows James Donovan, a
lawyer so idealistic and genuine that only Tom Hanks could make him believable
on-screen, which he most admirably does.
Charged with defending a Russian spy (Mark Rylance) tried in American
court, Donovan finds himself as one of the most hated men in America for simply
doing his job. He goes above and beyond
expectations to the disturbance of his legal peers, which earns him notice by
the U.S. government when the opportunity arises to exchange their Russian
prisoner for a Russian-held American spy.
Donovan is sent to East Germany to negotiate the exchange when he
discovers a U.S. civilian student is also being held prisoner, so he decides to
attempt a trade for both the student and the spy against his government’s
wishes.
With a script written by the Coen brothers and Matt Charman,
Bridge of Spies carefully walks the
line between absurdist observation and tense negotiation, and though I would
never have thought the Coens to be a good match for Spielberg, I find myself
surprised at how effective they work together.
Spielberg strikes the right balance so that the film never slips into
outright comedy, yet the wit and irreverence that makes the Coens so
entertaining manages to convey the intense gravity of Donovan’s
negotiations. Spielberg is a master of
not only directing actors and finding the emotional touchstones of his scripts,
but also of the technical aspects of filmmaking, whether it be choices in
lighting or framing a shot or the attention to detail in set design and making
what amounts to a film about conversations visually engaging. And remarkably this film doesn’t play to
sentimentality as much as it could, remaining hopeful about the ability of
people to peacefully settle disputes without ignoring the fact that neither
side perceives themselves as the villain.
If the film has one major flaw, it’s that the pacing feels
somewhat askew. The first act comprises
of nearly the entire first half of the 140 minute film, setting up Donovan’s
defense of his client as well as the hatred and disdain Donovan received from
the American people as he performed his legal duty. This never ceases to be compelling, and
establishing Donovan as a pariah is critical to his character arc, but it feels
like an odd allocation of comparative time when the focus of the film is
primarily upon the tension of the exchange of prisoners, not Donovan’s uphill
court battle that is ultimately a loss.
This is a minor quibble, though, and not one that should
prevent you from seeing a great film from one of the greats of American
cinema. There’s a reason that Steven
Spielberg is a household name, and while the past decade or so may have seen
some more pedestrian fare from the esteemed director, Bridge of Spies is proof that he can still make a great movie when
it counts. This may have been a box
office flop, but it deserves to live on among the many notable entries in Spielberg’s
filmography.
No comments:
Post a Comment