Coming of age stories are a favorite of the indie circuit,
probably because they are relatively cheap to produce but also because freshman
filmmakers are just themselves coming into their own as adults. This has led to an influx of pretentious
(…heh) independent cinema that is supposedly rich with the artistic flourishes
that influenced the auteur, but ultimately come down to a few comic book
sensibilities from their youth. The Diary of a Teenage Girl would
technically reside in this camp of genre convention, but it fortunately has
something else going for it that elevates it above other coming of age fare:
perspective.
Set in the 1970s and based on a memoir of the same name,
this is the story of Minnie, a fifteen year old girl who has a crush on her
mother’s boyfriend, Monroe (Alexander SkarsgĂ„rd). When Minnie asks Monroe to have sex with her,
he agrees, starting an affair the leads Minnie to question what she thought she
knew about sex, love, and anything outside and in between. Before you raise your pitchforks at the
pedophilic aspect of this film, yes, the relationship between Monroe and Minnie
is sexual and Minnie is underage. However, within the
context of the narrative, Minnie is entirely in control of the situation, and
Monroe is in no way malicious or manipulative, just a guy who says yes much too
easily to a series of really bad decisions.
See, the point of the story isn’t so much that Minnie is
coming into her own as a sexual being (though that is also certainly happening)
as it is that Minnie is learning about herself and her place in the world through
the act of sexual intercourse. She knows
that sexuality is a huge part of being an adult, and now that she is at least
physically an adult she wants to explore adult existence. This comes in the form of realizing how sex
plays a part in her life, what she wants from a sexual relationship, who she
wants to have sex with, and how this contrasts with the adults in her life,
most notably her mother. This is not a
film that is afraid to acknowledge budding female sexuality, which is a much
appreciated rarity in a culture that demonizes feminine promiscuity.
As much as I enjoyed the film for that reason, though, a few
token indie quirks still rub me the wrong way, though I will admit these are
mostly trappings of the genre that I don’t much care for. Minnie is an artist (because in an indie
film, of course she is), but the film goes so far as to animate her drawings
and those of her idols in colorful juxtaposition to her everyday life. This is a trick that has been used numerous
times in other low budget flicks looking for a distinct visual appeal that has
become so overplayed so as to no longer be distinct. It isn’t pervasive in this film, but it is
distracting when it does happen.
Furthermore, the soundtrack consists of acoustic guitar tracks that seem
compiled to say “Please buy this movie’s soundtrack album to support
independent artists.” It’s obtrusive and
really doesn’t fit the 1970s aesthetic the film is going for visually.
However, ranting about my pet peeves aside, The Diary of a Teenage Girl is a pretty
fantastic film that captures female sex positivity in a way that few films do. I specifically pursued this film for its
place on many critical top ten lists of 2015, and while I wouldn’t go so far as
to say it is that astounding, I think it is well worth watching and should
gather a following purely for its perspective on sex and how it plays a vital
role in a young woman’s development.
It’s worth it for that alone.
That plot summary makes me question the boundary between "female sex positivity" and "male sex fantasy." Teenage girls get crushes on older men, but that doesn't mean the consummation of those crushes isn't pedophilia, or that it's wrong to have one's creep-o-meter tripped by it.
ReplyDeleteI understand that concern, and I think the answer comes down to perspective. The film is based on a memoir by the protagonist character, so these experiences are told with her voice and are told as how they impact her, not in how they affect her older lover or in a way that fetishizes her. Viewing Monroe as a creep is an entirely valid way to read him. The point I was trying to get across was that the film is not an open endorsement of pedophilia or using young girls as a sexual fantasy.
Delete